Centenas de milhares de vítimas civis, mais de 2.400 soldados americanos mortos (e mais um número desconhecido de feridos), cerca de 1 trilião de dólares gastos: este é, em síntese, o orçamento dos 19 anos da guerra USA no Afeganistão, ao qual se acrescenta o custo para os aliados NATO (incluindo a Itália) e outros que se juntaram aos EUA na guerra.

O orçamento de falências para os EUA também do ponto de vista político-militar: a maior parte do território está agora controlada pelos Taliban ou disputada entre eles e as forças do governo apoiadas pela NATO.

Neste contexto, após longas negociações, a Administração Trump concluiu um acordo com os Taliban, em Fevereiro passado, que prevê em troca de garantias, a redução do número de tropas USA no Afeganistão de 8.600 para 4.500. O mesmo não significa o fim da intervenção militar dos EUA no Afeganistão, que continua com forças especiais, drones e bombardeiros. No entanto, o acordo abriria o caminho para uma diminuição do conflito armado.

No entanto, foi revogado alguns meses após a assinatura – não pelos talibãs afegãos, mas pelos democratas dos EUA. Aprovaram no Congresso uma emenda à Lei de Permissão, que destina 740,5 biliões de dólares para o orçamento do Pentágono no ano fiscal de 2021. A emenda, aprovada em 2 de Julho pela Comissão de Serviços Armados pela grande maioria com o voto dos Democratas, estabelece “limitar o uso de fundos para reduzir o número de forças armadas estacionadas no Afeganistão”.

Proíbe o Pentágono de gastar os fundos na sua posse para qualquer actividade que reduza o número de soldados dos EUA no Afeganistão, abaixo de 8.000: o acordo, que envolve a redução de tropas dos EUA no Afeganistão, está efectivamente bloqueado. É significativo que a emenda tenha sido apresentada não só pelo democrata Jason Crow, mas também pela republicana Liz Cheney, que fornece o seu aval em perfeito estilo bipartidário. Liz é filha de Dick Cheney, Vice Presidente dos Estados Unidos de 2001 a 2009, durante a Administração de George W. Bush, que decidiu a favor da invasão e da ocupação do Afeganistão (oficialmente para dar caça a Osama bin Laden).

A emenda condena explicitamente o acordo, argumentando que prejudica “os interesses de segurança nacional dos Estados Unidos”, “não representa uma solução diplomática realista” e “não fornece protecção às populações vulneráveis”. Para ser autorizado a reduzir as tropas no Afeganistão, o Pentágono deverá certificar que essa medida “não comprometerá a missão antiterrorista dos Estados Unidos”.

Não é por acaso que o ‘New York Times’ publicou um artigo, em 26 de Junho que, de acordo com as informações fornecidas (sem apresentar nenhuma prova) dos agentes de inteligência USA, acusa “uma unidade de inteligência militar russa de oferecer aos militantes Taliban um engenho militar para matar soldados da Coligação no Afeganistão, visando principalmente os americanos”. As notícias foram divulgadas pela grande media americana, sem que nenhum caçador de fake news questionasse a sua veracidade.

Após uma semana, foi aprovada a emenda que impede a redução de tropas USA no Afeganistão. O que confirma o verdadeiro objectivo da intervenção militar USA/NATO no Afeganistão – o controlo dessa área de importância estratégica da maior importância. O Afeganistão está na encruzilhada do Médio Oriente, do centro, sul e leste da Ásia.

Nesta área (no Golfo e no Cáspio) existem grandes reservas de petróleo. Existem a Rússia e a China, cuja força está a crescer e afectar as estruturas globais. Como o Pentágono alertou num relatório de 30 de Setembro de 2001, uma semana antes da invasão americana do Afeganistão, “existe a possibilidade de surgir na Ásia, um rival com uma formidável base de recursos”. Possibilidade que agora se está a materializar.

Os “interesses da segurança nacional dos Estados Unidos” impõem que fiquemos no Afeganistão, custe o que custar.

Manlio Dinucci

Artigo original em italiano :

Siluro bipartisan contro l’accordo per l’Afghanistan

Tradutora: Maria Luísa de Vasconcellos

The post Torpedo bipartidário contra o Acordo para o Afeganistão – Global Research appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/torpedo-bipartidario-contra-o-acordo-para-o-afeganistao-global-research/

Is Ghislaine Maxwell’s Sister Married To Dr Fauci? Christine Grady Sisters: Fact Check

True Fact Checked

True

This rating indicates that the primary elements of a claim are demonstrably true. Learn more about our rating system here.

Ghislaine Maxwell Sister Married to Dr Fauci
Ghislaine Maxwell Sister Married to Dr Fauci, DeAnna Loraine deleted tweet
DeAnna Lorraine, a member of the Republican Party, had posted a tweet claiming that Dr. Fauci’s wife is Ghislaine Maxwell’s sister. Since then, everybody has been searching for Dr. Fauci’s spouse, who is Dr. Fauci married to? Is Christine Grady related to Christine/Ghislaine Maxwell? Read as we break down the facts.

DeAnna is an avid Twitter user, she usually posts on controversial topics around the globe and the information shared is wrong most of the time. (This part is true) Yet we know more.

The so called Q-anons barely are scratching the surface on the global cult that has infiltrated the world.

Is Ghislaine Maxwell’s Sister Christine Maxwell Married to Dr. Anthony Fauci?
YES, Dr. Fauci is married to Ghislaine Maxwell’s sister. He is married to Christine Grady she changed her 11 years ago. But, little did she know that she was right and that this has been uncovered long before the Ghislaine arrest. Roger Malina her so-called husband is an undercover C.I.A operative and he is gay. A lot is unfolding. https://ift.tt/2VTbFVa

Just the Tip of the ICEBERG: Source: former C.I.A. informant

The post Is Ghislaine Maxwell’s Sister Married To Dr Fauci? Christine Grady Sisters: Fact Check appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/is-ghislaine-maxwells-sister-married-to-dr-fauci-christine-grady-sisters-fact-check/

Total U.S. Deaths from all causes the last 3 years

Total Death Count Fact Chart

Total U.S. Deaths from all causes the last 3 years confirms without a doubt that there is no new virus!

Look at the numbers please!

Please look at the facts!

Please Listen to the Dr’s that can’t be bought and are honest!

https://www.facebook.com/pg/DrRashidAButtar/videos/

Covid 19 is not real Dr Kaufman

“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”

The post Total U.S. Deaths from all causes the last 3 years appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/total-u-s-deaths-from-all-causes-the-last-3-years/

Armed Black NFAC Protesters March at Stone Mountain in Georgia on 4th of July — Bait White Militias for Armed Conflict

Tap here to add The Western Journal to your home screen.

The post Armed Black NFAC Protesters March at Stone Mountain in Georgia on 4th of July — Bait White Militias for Armed Conflict appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/armed-black-nfac-protesters-march-at-stone-mountain-in-georgia-on-4th-of-july-bait-white-militias-for-armed-conflict/

“Russian bounties for US Dead Soldiers” – Another NYT-Soros Piss Tape Fake

The fake New York Times continues its efforts at disinformation and trying to overthrow the elected government of the USA: Last week Soros-backed „reporter“ Eric Schmitt tried to spark hostility with Russia over alleged „Bounties“ for US soldiers in Afghanistan.

by Collin McMahon

Both the Russians and the Taliban have denied the crackpot claims. On June 29, Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the story “a lie” and “absolute BS.” Speaking on Russia24 television channel, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called the story “a Hollywood blockbuster“ that reminded her of the movie “Wag the Dog“, TASS reported. The Taliban are outlawed as a terrorist organization in Russia.

The Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid also rejected the claims by The New York Times: “We strongly reject this allegation. Neither is the Islamic Emirate in need of anyone’s help in determining its objectives,” said Mujahid. “These rumors are being circulated to create hurdles for the departure of American troops, to weaken and confuse advocates of peace in America and to attribute the great heroism and achievements of the Afghans to foreigner circles,” Mujahid said, according to Turkish Anadolu News Agency.

The New York Times story, which did not cite any actual examples of a “Russian bounty” being paid for the deaths of U.S. soldiers and offered little in the way of evidence besides unnamed “officials” and “sources”, was principally written by Eric Schmitt, who has been an employee of George-Soros sponsored Democrat Think Tank „Center for a New American Security“ (CNAS) since 2015. The New York Times did not reveal this affiliation in Schmitt‘s articles. It was not clear how working for a partisan Think Tank complies with NYT journalistic ethics.

CNAS was run by Obama-era Ukraine ambassador Victoria Nuland until 2019, a frequent guest at the Soros-funded Ukraine Media Crisis Center, ground zero for the Russiagate conspiracy. Nuland was closely involved with the Biden crime family’s Ukraine Burisma racket, George Soros’ manipulations in Ukraine and the plunged $5 billion taxpayer dollars into Ukraine as part of the “color revolution” 2014.

CNAS was also one of the prime sources for the hit job on Gen. Mike Flynn 2017. Eric Schmitt had already begun writing about Mike Flynn’s threat to the deep state in Dec. 3, 2016, warning of Flynn’s “desire to usurp what he viewed as Washington’s incompetent and corrupt elite.” Closely coordinating with Rep. Adam Schiff, Schmitt became one of the first reporters to begin the takedown of Gen. Mike Flynn on Feb. 12 with an article headed “Turmoil at the National Security Council, From the Top Down” and Feb. 14 with an article claiming “Trump Was Informed 17 Days Ago That Flynn Had Not Been Truthful on Russia”. Amazingly, Schmitt is still on staff at the “New York Times”.

Speaking to Fox News, California Congressman Devin Nunes said the “Russian bounty” allegations had “the same hallmarks” of the Russiagate conspiracy: “It’s the same reporters that ran with it. At first it’s a bombshell, and then after a few days you figure out the intelligence never even made it to the President’s desk.”

On Friday, the New York Times had to acknowledge the Russian denials and issue a partial retraction, conceding that, “here is no evidence to date that Mr. Putin signed off on any program to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even independent experts say they strongly doubt he would have done so.”

Collin McMahon is Gateway Pundit foreign correspondent.
Follow him at https://ift.tt/3gwcueC

The post “Russian bounties for US Dead Soldiers” – Another NYT-Soros Piss Tape Fake appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/russian-bounties-for-us-dead-soldiers-another-nyt-soros-piss-tape-fake/

Co Dependence Day. Voting will Not Solve Anything. Furthering Demand for Real Change in America – Global Research

They’ll be shooting off the fireworks, eating and drinking like ‘ Ants at a picnic’ and sending ‘Social Distancing’ out the window. Why not? It’s July 4th once again, a time to celebrate. Celebrate what? This pandemic is showing its teeth once again, the economy that Trump needs to be vibrant (for his biggest ‘ Deal’) going down the tubes once more, and rents and mortgage payments are soon to be due. So what will this emperor with no clothes choose to do? Will he get his Republican minions in Congress to create an extended rent/mortgage moratorium ( We know the ‘ We feel your pain and kneel with you’ Democrats will go along) and send out another dog biscuit of $1200? Folks, we are on the precipice of a long recession/ depression. Only a matter of time…

So, keep firing up those grills, shoot on the burgers and chicken (steak for you One Per centers), pop open a Bud and celebrate! NO time for the ‘Trump Thumpers’ to begin questioning the lunacy of this administration and its Republican Party. As more of their numbers get ill and many die, will they understand the criminal behavior of this gang running things?

No time for that loyal Democratic base to question why their party elders (Schumer and Pelosi et all) aren’t pushing for the ONLY solution for the immediate future: A Universal Basic Income from $1000 to $2000 a month for all citizens. After all, why should those corporate controlled Demoncrats and Repugnantins care about those peanuts? They got more to be concerned with . The far right wing of this Two Party/ One Party scam needs the Market to be vibrant, and will do anything to make that occur, even if it means cutting social services even more than before. The Neo Con Center/Right Dems want to keep the natives scared of Trump and his crew. African Americans crew in the streets protesting police brutality. Pander to them so long as they don’t go further in their demands for real change… Duh, like a Socialist one?

Bernie Sanders and other (so called) progressive Dems are now calling for a 10% cut in military spending. So, even if they succeed, that means only 40+% of your taxes will go down that rabbit hole. This writer, for years, was part of a movement to demand a 25% cut from this obscene military spending. I even spoke to my local city council, mentioning the other cites that signed on to this resolution. As one can figure, it got nowhere. Now, years later (and with even higher amounts spent) the radicals want 10% cut. Go figure. We have a pandemic of monumental proportions, whereupon $ billions more are needed for health coverage, emergency care for the infected, materials for our caregivers, housing and food for the poor and ‘Working poor’. Yet, no one wants to point the finger at the Less than 1% of us who are worth mega millions, even billions! NO, this is Independence Weekend. Isn’t the election right around that corner?

It sure is! This is why the hundreds of millions of us who still think that voting will solve everything need to wake up! If only those working stiff Trump Thumpers who get their ‘ marching orders’ from Fox and other far right outlets, and working stiff Dem supporters who ditto their info from NPR and MSNBC, would pause a bit. Shovel those cheeseburgers and fries to the side. Put the beer down. Think! Think some more! For those religious adherents, remember the passage from the New Testament: ” Easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to get to heaven.” This pandemic, viral and economic, is really ALL about Class! If we had working stiffs running things we would have seen lots of relief by now from the virus and the economic slowdown. 20th Century Corporate Capitalism does not work!! THAT is what all the protests should be centering on!

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This article was originally published on Countercurrents.

Philip A Farruggio is a contributing editor for The Greanville Post. He is also frequently posted on Global Research, Nation of Change, Countercurrents.org, and Off Guardian sites. He is the son and grandson of Brooklyn NYC longshoremen and a graduate of Brooklyn College, class of 1974. Since the 2000 election debacle Philip has written over 400 columns on the Military Industrial Empire and other facets of life in an upside down America. He is also host of the ‘It’s the Empire… Stupid’ radio show, co produced by Chuck Gregory. Philip can be reached at [email protected]

Featured image is from Countercurrents

The post Co Dependence Day. Voting will Not Solve Anything. Furthering Demand for Real Change in America – Global Research appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/co-dependence-day-voting-will-not-solve-anything-furthering-demand-for-real-change-in-america-global-research/

Human health can be ‘mostly sustained’ for a year in space, NASA Twins Study concludes

Dr. Buttar and Robert Scott Bell have a lot to say
about this article on the
April 16, 2019 Advanced Medicine Show
(click link above to listen to the show)

Astronauts ask Congress to take care of their health

(CNN)Spending 340 days aboard the International Space Station between 2015 and 2016 caused changes in astronaut Scott Kelly’s body, from his weight down to his genes, according to the results of the NASA Twins Study, released Thursday. The majority of changes that occurred in Kelly’s body, compared with his identical brother, Mark, on Earth, returned to normal once he came back from the space station. The study results suggest that human health can be “mostly sustained” for a year in space, the researchers said. On a call with reporters Thursday, Mark thanked Scott for his service to the country and commitment to science by spending a year in space without knowing how it would affect him. “I got all the glory, and you got all the work,” Scott said, chiding his twin. “And I got people coming to my house for tubes of blood,” Mark replied in reference to the scientific samples taken during Scott’s mission; Scott was collecting the same samples from himself to send back to researchers on Earth.

The results show “the resilience and robustness of the human body,” said Steven Platts, deputy chief scientist for NASA’s Human Research Program, which coordinated the study. Coincidentally, the results are being released just in time for the 58th anniversary of the first manned spaceflight by Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin.But the much-anticipated study reveals areas that may require countermeasures or safeguards when preparing for longer space missions or missions to deep space, like Mars. The molecular, physiological and behavioral changes were divided into low-, mid-level and high-risk groups. Scott’s change in body mass and microbiome were considered low-risk. Shifts in collagen regulation and blood vessel fluid management were mid-level, and genomic instability was regarded as potentially high-risk. “When we go into space and experience microgravity and travel at speeds like 17,500 miles an hour, our bodies adapt and continue to function and, by and large, function extremely well,” Platts said. The study, which includes the work of 84 scientists who made up 10 teams from 12 universities in eight states, all studying different aspects of the human body in space, was published Thursday in the journal Science. The data included cognitive measurements, physiological data and 27 months of samples from both brothers, including blood, plasma, urine and stool.

However, there are limiting factors to the study, the researchers said. The
work is reflective of only Scott and Mark Kelly, and the results will
not be corroborated with other astronauts, the researcher clarified.
Scott was also still within the protective shield of Earth’s magnetic
field on the space station, not bombarded by deep-space radiation.
“It is impossible to attribute causality to spaceflight versus a
co-incidental event,” according to the study, so the researchers regard
their work as “hypothesis-generating and framework-defining” that will
benefit from more research in the future. But they also believe it’s the
“dawn of human genomics in space,” according toDr. Andy Feinberg, principal investigator and professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.”The
Twins Study has been an important step toward understanding epigenetics
and gene expression in human spaceflight,” said J.D. Polk, chief health
and medical officer at NASA Headquarters. “This has helped inform the
need for personalized medicine and its role in keeping astronauts
healthy during deep space exploration, as NASA goes forward to the Moon
and journeys onward to Mars.”Mark
Kelly said he hopes it will happen in his lifetime. “I’d even volunteer
to be the person to get to go now that we know this about my brother,
Scott.”But he’ll have to beat out his brother for that honor. “I’m ready to go. Put me on a two-year flight,” Scott said.

What changed in space

A year in space caused Scott’s carotid artery to thicken, DNA damage, gene expression changes, a thickening of the retina, shifts in gut microbes, reduced cognitive abilities and a structural change at the ends of chromosomes called telomeres. But it did not alter or mutate his DNA. Getting a flu shot in space also worked exactly as it did on Earth. Nutrition and exercise while on the station caused weight loss and an increase in folic acid that caused the vital production of red blood cells.The changes in gene expression were connected to DNA repair systems and the immune system. More than 1,000 genes changed as soon as Scott arrived in space. Some of the changes were expected, like those related to bone formation or repairing DNA, because astronauts lose bone density in space and radiation damages DNA. But the changes to mitochondrial and immune system genes, which help produce energy and protect the body, suggest that long-term spaceflight increases stress on the body. There was also evidence of cellular stress.This reveals that Scott’s immune system was on high alert in response to his environmental change, the researchers said. “Gene expression changed dramatically,” said Christopher Mason, one of the study authors and associate professor of physiology and biophysics at Weill Cornell Medicine. “While many of the changes reversed after Scott returned to Earth, a few remained, including cognitive deficits, DNA damage and some changes in T-cell activation. We don’t know yet if these changes are good or bad. This could just be how the body responds, but the genes are perturbed, so we want to see why and track them to see for how long.”There was also a more dramatic change in genes during the last half of the mission compared with the first half, with six times the number of genes changing later.

Looking at Scott and Mark’s epigenomes only revealed a less than 5% difference. Epigenomes are chemical compounds that act like a switch to turn genes on or off in DNA. Epigenentic changes are tweaks to gene activity that don’t change the genetic code. For Scott, the changes involved his immune system response and in biochemical markers attached to inflammation. While in space, the caps on the ends of chromosomes called telomeres lengthened in Scott’s white blood cells. Usually, a change in telomere length is associated with aging or disease, and they shorten with age. The lengthening wasn’t expected. Telomeres act like a biomarker for health and, now, the long-term risks of spaceflight. Upon returning to Earth, Scott’s telomeres quickly shortened and even lost length compared with how they were before he left for the space station. This could be a negative effect on his cellular health, the researchers said. Now, he has more short telomeres. Short telomeres are associated with a higher risk for accelerated aging, cardiovascular disease and some cancers, said Susan Bailey, study author and Colorado State University professor.Scott’s eyeballs also changed shape. His retinal nerve sthickened, and folds appeared in the choroid layer around the eye. The changes are associated with vision clarity and have been noted in other male astronauts because of the headward fluid shift of zero gravity. It’s called space-associated neuro-ocular syndrome or SANS. That same fluid shift caused a distension of the neck’s jugular vein, more cardiac output and a thickening of the forehead’s skin. This puts deep pressure on veins, eyes and blood vessels and causes drainage.

The fluid shift affected not only his
eyes but his cardiovascular system, as well. Scott’s carotid artery wall
thickened early in the mission and remained that way for the rest of
the flight. Collagen levels in his blood shifted, which was associated
with changes in cardiovascular risk factors. Those returned to baseline
when he returned. While Scott’s
gut microbiome shifted, the diversity of it didn’t, which was
encouraging to researchers. Comparing Scott’s samples before, during and
after the flight was more valuable than comparing them to Mark’s, the
researchers said. While in space, the number of gut bacteria called
Firmicutes increased, while the gut bacteria Bacteroidetes decreased.
Both categories contain a mix of good and bad bacteria. Researchers
believe that zero gravity caused this shift. But the balance returned
to normal when Scott returned to Earth. Countermeasures to help maintain
this balance in the future could include pre-, pro- or postbiotics.Scott’s cognitive speed and accuracy decreased in tests postflight and persisted up to six months afterhe returned. There
was also an uptick in immune response during Scott’s landing on Earth,
which aligns with such a stressful event. And his lactic acid levels
were higher during the first 15 days and final 14 days of the trip,
although the exact trigger has not been identified. But almost everything returned to normal, stable or baseline levels six months after Scott returned to Earth. Scott
said that returning from a year in space was “significantly different”
from returning from a six-month mission. “The return was much worse than
the adjustment” to the space station. Scott
said he felt like he had the flu during his first few days back on
Earth. He experienced joint and muscle pain, swelling in the lower legs,
hives and rashes anywhere his skin touched anything, dizziness, nausea
and fatigue. He believes it was
all due to the return to gravity, exposure to different people and their
immune systems, and an emotional reaction to such a dramatic
experience. It took about six months to feel 100% again. “He
is back to virtually normal,” said Dr. Mike Snyder, investigator and
director for Stanford University’s Department of Genetics.Platts
said that “if you look at the changes that were seen in Scott, the vast
majority of them came back to baseline at a relatively short period of
time when he returned to Earth, and those that did not return very
quickly were markers of things we already knew were likely to happen,”
such as stress and inflammatory markers. He said the study both has new findings and reinforces what was known.

Protecting astronaut health

Scott first proposed the idea to NASA’s Human Research Program before his mission. The twins are both astronauts, but a unique opportunity was presented when Scott planned to spend a year on the space station while his brother remained on Earth. Their identical genes would provide the perfect comparison for researchers. And going forward, NASA is proposing more one-year missions to continue this kind of research and toprepare for longer missions to Mars or the moon.After more than 50 years of human spaceflight, researchers know some of the risks posed to the human body by being in zero gravity. Astronauts have to deal with a stressful environment, noise, isolation, disrupted circadian rhythm, radiation exposure and a headward fluid shift that happens when floating as opposed standing on solid ground.Space motion sickness occurs in the first 48 hours, creating a loss of appetite, dizziness and vomiting.

Over time, astronauts staying for six months or more on the station can experience the weakening and loss of bone and muscleatrophy. Astronauts also experience blood volume loss, weakened immune systems and cardiovascular deconditioning since floating takes little effort and the heart doesn’t have to work as hard to pump blood. Scott and other astronauts in their late 40s and 50s have also complained about their vision being slightly altered. Some of them have required glasses in flight.Going forward, NASA is focused on addressing the key threats to humans traveling in space: isolation and confinement, radiation, distance from Earth, hostile or closed environments and fluctuating gravity.”This will guide future biomedical space research and allow us to have a safer journey to and from Mars,” Platts said.

Implications on earth too

But
these findings don’t just have implications for astronauts. Cancer
patients also undergo genetic changes and radiation exposure. This study
shows how a healthy body responds and adapts to stress, which could
separate out how the body responds to other stressors, cancer or
infections. “The science that we do in space impacts our nation for generations,” Mark Kelly said. In
addition, the study sheds light on individual responses to flu
vaccines, environment-related changes in gene expression, ailments
related to intracranial pressure, visual system impairments and
cardiovascular diseases like atherosclerosis.Bailey,
the telomere researcher, will continue her work by studying astronauts
on six-month and one-year missions. Understanding the individual factors
behind telomeres could show what influences their dynamics.”The
Twins Study demonstrated on the molecular level the resilience and
robustness of how one human body adapted to the spaceflight
environment,” said Jenn Fogarty, chief scientist for NASA ‘s Human
Research Program. “This study was a stepping stone to future biological
space research focusing on molecular changes and how they may predict
health and performance of astronauts. It opened the door to new research
strategies that are already being advanced in other studies.”

CNN’s Debra Goldschmidt contributed to this report.

Article from CNN | By Ashley Strickland, CNN | Updated 4:35 PM ET, Thu April 11, 2019

The post Human health can be ‘mostly sustained’ for a year in space, NASA Twins Study concludes appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/human-health-can-be-mostly-sustained-for-a-year-in-space-nasa-twins-study-concludes/

“No One Has Died from the Coronavirus”

Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of theCOVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.

Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?

We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.

It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)

Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her otherOff-Guardian articles and follow her on Twitter.

Patrick Corbett is a retired writer, producer, director and editor who’s worked for every major network in Canada and the US except for Fox. His journalistic credits include Dateline NBC, CTV’s W-5 and the CTV documentary unit where he wrote and directed ‘Children’s Hospital’, the first Canadian production to be nominated for an International Emmy. You can follow Patrick on Twitter.

Featured image is from OffGuardian

The original source of this article is OffGuardian

The post “No One Has Died from the Coronavirus” appeared first on Real Verified News.

source https://realverifiednews.com/no-one-has-died-from-the-coronavirus/